Comparison Between Legislature Procedure In State Legislature And Parliament
Introduction
India has a parliamentary form of government with bicameral legislatures in some of its states and at the national level. The Lok Sabha (House of the People), Rajya Sabha (Council of States), and the Indian President make up the Parliament. Making laws is the main responsibility of the national and state legislatures. The State Legislature is covered in Articles 168 to 212 of Part VI of the Constitution, and the Parliament is covered in Articles 79 to 122 of Part V of the Constitution.
Legislative Process: Definition
• In each of the two Houses of Parliament, the legislative process is the same. When a bill is properly enacted, it becomes an act or law and is presented for legislation.
• Four categories Ordinary, Money, Financial, and Constitutional Amendment Bills can be used to categorize bills.
• Both government and private member bills follow the same legislative process. According to Article 109, Money Bills and Finance Bills cannot be introduced in the Rajya Sabha. They can only be discussed in Lok Sabha. This implies that they cannot be presented as Private Members' Bills. Both houses are able to introduce the remaining bills.
Constitutional Requirements For Legislative Procedure In State And Federal Legislatures
• The Constitution's Articles 107 to 122 address the legislative process in relation to the passage of bills in Parliament.
• The terms of the introduction and passage of the Bill are described in Article 196 of the Indian Constitution.
• With one exception, Articles 198 and 207 describe the steps involved in passing a money bill and a financial bill, respectively.
• The legislature's other bills may be introduced in either House.
Stages of Bill Passage
|
Stages of the Bills |
Provisions of the Bills |
|
Introduction |
|
|
Second Reading |
The bill may be taken into consideration at once;
|
|
Committee Stage |
|
|
Consideration State |
|
|
Third Reading |
|
|
Bill in the other House |
|
|
Joint Sitting |
|
|
President’s Assent |
|
Specific Rules For Money Bills And Finance Bills
A bill is considered to be a money bill under Article 110 of the Indian Constitution if it exclusively deals with any or all of the following issues:
• The levying, repealing, waiving, changing, or regulating of any tax.
• The controls on the government of India's borrowing of funds.
• The management of the Indian Contingency Fund or the Consolidated Fund, as well as the payment of funds into or withdrawals from any such fund.
• The taking of funds from the Indian Consolidated Fund.
• The declaration of any expense as one charged to the Consolidated Fund of India or the raising of any such expenditure's amount.
• The receiving of withdrawals, the custody of India's public accounts, the audit of the Union's or a State's accounts, and any issue related to any of the aforementioned issues.
• If there is any doubt as to whether a Bill is a money Bill or not, the Lok Sabha Speaker's decision is decisive. In this case, neither the President nor either House of Parliament or a court of law may challenge his decision.
• The President's recommendation is required before the Money Bill can be introduced. The Rajya Sabha receives the President's recommendation, which is required for introduction in the Lok Sabha, along with the Speaker's affirmation that it is a money bill, for its recommendation.
• A Money Bill cannot be rejected or changed by the Rajya Sabha under its own authority. He just serves as a recommendation.
• The Rajya Sabha must return the Bill to the Lok Sabha with or without recommendations within 14 days of receiving it from the Lok Sabha. The Rajya Sabha's recommendation is not need to be accepted by the Lok Sabha.
• The Money Bill will be considered to have been approved by both Houses if it is passed by the Lok Sabha, whether or not the Rajya Sabha's suggestion is accepted. The Speaker will then present the Money Bill to the President for his approval.
• The President must give his approval to a Money Bill, he cannot send it to Parliament for reconsideration.
In addition to incorporating any or all of the items listed under Article 110, the Finance Bill also includes other items. Article 117 of the Constitution deals with them. There are two categories of financial bills that do not gain the Speaker's certification:
• A Bill that includes any of the items listed in Article 110 but does not just deal with those items, for instance, a Bill that includes a taxation section but does not only address taxes [Article 117(1)].
• Any regular Bill that includes clauses relating Consolidated Fund expenditures (Article 117(3)).
The only difference between a finance bill and a regular bill is that:
• Without the President's prior approval, it cannot be introduced.
• Only the Lok Sabha may introduce legislation.
• Additionally, the President has the authority to submit a financial bill for the Parliament's once-over.
• Such a Financial Bill may be rejected or amended by the Rajya Sabha.
State's Legislative Proposal
• A state with a unicameral legislature has a straightforward legislative process. The Legislative Assembly is the sole source of all bills, which are then submitted to the governor for approval after being lawfully passed.
• But in a bicameral legislature, the process is a little different than in a parliament, if the Vidhan Sabha rejects a bill that was first introduced in the Vidhan Parishad, the bill is dead.
• Money Bills are handled in exactly the same way as Parliamentary business. However, when a financial or regular bill is enacted by the Vidhan Sabha, it is sent to the Vidhan Parishad. The bill is referred back to the Lower House if the Upper House: Outright Rejects the Bill, Suggests Amendments Unacceptable to the Vidhan Sabha, or Does Not Act on the Bill for Three Months.
• If the bill is approved by the Vidhan Sabha a second time, it is then resubmitted to the Vidhan Parishad at the end of one month, or The Parishad rejects the Bill.
The Bill is approved by the Parishad with modifications when the Vidhan Sabha rejects:
• The Bill is then brought to the Governor for his approval after being judged to have received the support of both Houses in the form in which it was approved by the assembly for the second time.
• The Upper House lacks the same authority as the Lower House and is unable to alter a Bill on its own.
• It can only postpone a bill's passage for a maximum of four months.
• A combined session of the state legislature is not allowed to break an impasse over a Bill's passage.
Conclusion
The Indian Constitution was drafted with the goal of providing impartial, effective, and honest service to its populace. Compared to the State Legislature, the legislative procedure of Parliament has greater authority. Legislative councils in state legislatures only have advisory authority, whereas in parliament, the upper house and lower house both have equal authority, with few exceptions. It is concluded that the parliament possesses considerable influence in a variety of different ways.


